What Leaders Want
Results from the National
Litigation Management Study
Study participants in the recent litigation management study conducted by
Revere Advisory and commissioned by
the Council on Litigation Management
identified several metrics that they rely
upon as primary indicators of litigation
management effectiveness. Those fall
generally into the five following categories:
Inventory Counting of matters,
Speed of resolution
Both outcome and
expense
Quality As rated by stake-
holders, insureds,
internal staff
Predictability Anticipated versus
realized (budget,
Time
Cost
measurement and metrics, offering up some
thoughts on how we can work together to
determine which metrics are the ones that
matter most. Excerpts from that roundtable
are included in the box to the right.
The litigation management industry is
abuzz with talk about metric-driven organizations, alternative fee arrangements and
creative law firm pricing, but are law firms
and their clients looking at the right metrics?
What has changed, what hasn’t? How do
firms and clients share information with each
other for mutual gain? These are some of the
fundamental questions the industry needs to
ask in order to arrive at the kinds of metrics
that help build trusted partnerships between
clients and their outside counsel. What is the
one thing that all roundtable participants
agreed upon? If the goal is a successful long-term relationship between law firms and
clients, having some transparency around
the metrics by which success is measured is a
good way to establish the necessary trust and
communication.
Dan Ruderman is responsible for consulting alliances and the insurance sector at the LexisNexis
CounselLink business unit.
36 | LitigationManagement | summer 2011
Haskin: What metrics does your company use to judge your department? If your
CEO walks through the door, what is the number one metric he will want to know?
Haskin: How about with respect to measuring outside counsel? What do you use?