SPECIFICALLY SPEAKING | CONSTRUCTION
The Devil is
in the Details
Successfully Revoking the indemnity Dilemma
By elizabeth a. Skane and Chris Casson
Whenfacedwith theindemnity dilemma,the keystosuccess- fullyresolvingit
are to: know the facts, know the agreement and know the law. The concept
of indemnity seems straight forward
enough, but is it? One party asks for
and the other agrees to provide indemnity to the other. As is often the case
however, the devil is in the details and
when it comes to indemnity, the details
have been a battleground for over a
century and will surely continue to be
so into the foreseeable future.
The trend in the construction industry
has been an attempt to level the playing field by restricting and regulating
the types of enforceable indemnity
provisions. This results, in many cases,
in unintended consequences inherent
with such legislation. Construction
cases often involve numerous parties,
contracts and indemnity agreements.
Who is to be made whole and why?
When does the obligation to protect
the indemnitee begin? Is there a distinction for causation or fault? How
does insurance interplay in the milieu
of competing agreements? Managing
the answers to these questions can
make the difference between successfully managing the litigation or not.
In the construction world, indemnity
agreements usually follow a hierarchy
where artisan subcontractors must
agree to indemnify a general contrac-
tor and/or developer in order to work
on the project. If during the course of
that work or after the work is complet-
ed, damages are claimed, there may
be a number of parties who share the
blame and are liable for the damages,
including the party indemnified. This
sets the table for contentious litigation
because of the potential inequity cre-
ated for the artisan on the one hand
and the general contractor on the oth-
er. Moreover, indemnity agreements
today are written in many different
forms and laws in various venues may
restrict how much indemnity may
be available through the agreements.
Which is why in managing construc-
tion defect litigation involving indem-
nity provisions, it is so important to
evaluate the facts, terms of the indem-
nity agreement and the law.
Know the Facts
The initial goal of any case should be
the same — to discover as quickly as
possible the facts that may be considered in determining the basic but
always important information of who,
what, when, why and where.
Who? In the typical construction defect
action, the plaintiff homeowners sue